In this example, I've moved the bishops cynically, I moved the bishops and in fact, do you think
you can also coincide here with that bishops on each sex?
And Complan consequence, I hope you say no in both cases, because it would be Jack, it would be Jack,
you can't consequence either.
You can't put your king in check.
You can cancel Kingside and opponents can cancel Kingside after your turn, but they can't consequence
for the very same reason it would be Jack.
Like you can't put your king in check.
You never put your king in check.
So when you're playing casually, just that in mind.
Kings should not be put in check.
Yeah, it's just not a legal thing.
This is not a legal thing, so I hope that's clear enough that Kosslyn Queen side is totally illegal
here because that Bishop controls C1.
But if the bishop was here, then that would be legal because the king wouldn't even be passing through
Chank if it was on Desex.
But on age six, it makes constant Queensland illegal.
And just to recap, if the opponents say put a rook on the table like this and they a rock on the eight,
the queen side, but for two reasons, we can't now, even if the bishop wasn't there, we couldn't
possibly check on that rook.
But we can cancel Kingside, OK?
And that's coming off so much.