Hi there.
In this lecture, I just want to make it clear that Jack doesn't end the game.
For example, here the white king is in check.
Bonds of the king have to in this particular position, black can actually end the game with check and
mate.
It's checkmate because the king can't get out of the chank.
There's no escape squares.
The pawn is controlling those three squares.
The queen is controlling E to G one AF1 Iwon as well as well as the Knights.
So this is checkmate and it's one of the more common ways of winning in the game of chess.
So chameides ends the game and as such, it's important to bear that in mind, even philosophically,
that you can be down in material.
You can also sacrifice material, sometimes deliberately, if you can reach a checkmate where you've
checkmated the opponent's king.
So Chiangmai ends the game and it doesn't matter how sophisticated you get in your chess later your
big chance journey, you could accumulate lots of very, very advanced principles.
But if you neglect King safety and you get checkmated, then you lose.
Or if your opponent neglects King's safety, hopefully, and you try to make them as more optimistic,
then you win.
So just bear in mind that, especially from a philosophical perspective, that everything else is trade
off for checkmate because it will win you the game.
Checkmate and the game, as Nigel Short said, one of the top British players, you know, pawns, pawns
structure is nice to be interested in, but checkmate ends the game.
OK, as a mouse.