Hi there in this election, we see another example of the any kind of pattern, this was played way
back in 16 23 by Grecco.
So if all from Grecco, we see big things from this kind of anonymous opponents and then no name.
So therefore should be seven that we see Bishop Differe and now blank does weaken that diagonal.
So there's a temptation to exploit this diagonal, to take on geto.
Won't does indulge black in taking on our five, seemingly offering a whole rook.
So this is kind of spectacular use of baiting the opponent to get this weakened diagonal.
Now it seems as though hold on, isn't this Digable kind of blocked up by that pawn anyway?
Why it plays Quiñones five.
Jacare of the Gee thinks it's getting dangerous offtakes.
Gee, thanks.
But now Black seems to almost save the day with hitting the queen, asking the queen to go away.
And isn't that the end of the story?
If you go away to the front, then maybe they're just going to take your rook and be better.
Have you got another move here if I give you five seconds to pause video?
So try and celebrate essentially this downside, you're trying to highlight this downside, Black's
position.
So what would you play here, move your queen away, or is there something much, much better?
If I give you five seconds to pause, video won't play.
OK.
It's actually to take on seven, believe it or not, there's very limited replies that can only really
take the queen, but now we have Bishop G sex and that is checkmate.
So congratulations, if you found that it's not a celebration of that kind of weakened diagonal, the
king's lack of escape squares.
So you see these kind of patterns on the chessboard and you can try and leverage them in your own games
as much as possible.
All right.
Hoagland's reinforced that false bank kind of pattern.
That's so much.