Hi there in this sector online.
Give you a brief overview and summary of the Corica on the fence.
So when you play EFORE and they play C6, this can be the start of the second defense, especially if
you play the main line defore the five.
This is Corrick on defense main line.
So the Kocon defense was described in the Queen's Gambit series on that Netflix as all pawns and no
hope.
I think it's actually quite a good weapon of choice for the player with the black pieces.
It doesn't suffer the so-called bad bishop of the French defense.
The bishop at least, is kept more active in the coracle, in the French defense.
By contrast, you see the bishops close.
Then the correction at least tries to keep this bishop on C8 kind of active quite often.
The Kate Bishop and a variety of different things can be a problem piece for black.
So bear that in mind.
There are quite a lot of important strategies to do of trying to keep this C8 bishop locked in to its
own -- chain.
But here, the correction.
In contrast, the French defense does give priority to that bishop being active.
So what do you do here so well, after C6?
Yeah, the main move is DeFore.
So this is a principled opening move.
They want to try and get two points to the center to look at those central squares.
We see black most often playing D5 and now here you can either play 93 or 92 in the main variations.
There are other stuff.
I mean, there's other fun stuff.
We'll have a look at that soon at.
What else we can do it move free, but let's say we stick with these two main moves that move free,
so noisy, free now black complaint details e4 after nine states, they can bring that out like this.
And there's a lot of theory here in the so-called classical variation.
So quite often, you know, it goes back and then moves like eight four eight six.
My free 97 might be this one's quite common and, you know, sometimes the bishops chase back an exchange
off and the ferry goes on and on and on.
You need to look at ideally important monster games.
But the classical version has been well worked out and is thought to be pretty playable for both sides.
You've got to know the kind of imbalances and how they match your personality and interests.
So if you like solid, reliable positions without any structural issues, the classical variation could
be the one for you to choose with black for whites, you know the imbalances you might like the extra
space and playing on with constant in Queensland later.
So there is stuff of interest for both sides to find out about as well.
So the classical version is that with that Bishop five, there's also the modern version with 97 and
there's no trap in the trap section I've mentioned, which is Queene to foster time controls if they
play this.
Just to recap on that, you have 96 check and mate by Queene to OC is an interesting move.
But the most official recommended move here after 97 is usually just night Afri not playing for that
trap.
And after they have sex, you can have either taking and there's other variations to check out as well.
So that's on the modern generation.
When 97 is played, players play this to try and avoid any structural issue with their pawn structure.
So these other two are much more exciting in that regard.
So knights have sex immediately without like these seven is asking for 90s of sex check to double its
--'s black and take two ways.
Both of them are very interesting.
I personally prefer it.
My my tendency for this takes sex I've seen so many times in the last couple of years and GMs use this
with great success on the force the time controls rather than safe sex.
There's a lot of pressure on White's position.
Blake has that same foul.
Both sides are sharing this foul.
There's a lot of pressure and opportunities for Blake.
And, you know, quite often the fans, the time shows are not really about the end games and the end
games in particular.
You'd think that this these double pawns means, you know, White's got a queen size, poor majority
for or against free later on in the end games.
And you can use such a poor majority to create a passport, form a dangerous passport.
But generally the middle game makes it usually worth it to play like this.
So this variation, the course of action is very, very interesting to consider.
Victor Cushiony was such an amazing player with a huge amount of games and databases, such an experienced
Vosta experienced players, and this is named after him.
So the great Victor cautionary, one of the so-called uncrowned kings or Chassy, many feel, you know,
he was definitely up there with world champions in terms of strength.
But for many, many years, it was a great challenge to Anatoly Karpov.
So that's named after him.
We have details.
FDX, which is the bronze team, Lost Generation, and two very, very famous players, David Bronstein
and Ben Nelson.
So Getafe six, you can even check out their games with their seats.
You know, they play there quite often.
This goal can be dangerous for why if Whitecross was kingside later and Blatt might even cancel Queensland
later, get some very, very exciting games are played that myself on occasion in the past and have
had great fun of it.
So doubling --'s is not the end of the world here.
You don't have to play the modern version.
You can venture double pawns.
Chess is a very, very, very deep, fascinating game where you can deliberately create trade offs for
pawn structure versus peace activity and opportunities and then factor in the dimension of what time
control you're playing and how much opening for your opponent might not might know or not know.
But yeah, if you want a very, very exciting game with the black pieces.
Yeah.
Having double points both ways is worth checking out and seeing what your results are.
But when you do these experiments in your own games, make sure you do research a bit and have some
general model games, you know, certain games they've checked out in advance.
But yeah, they're named after famous players.
You can even just check out those players, how they play that.
Those two are so OK.
Now, often I see free.
There's also the so-called Gurgaon, these very rare.
So that's G six.
Now, you don't have to play 93 or 92, you can play the ComicCon advance for nation.
Now, unlike playing against the French defense, black often here playing special hour five.
And one thing not to do this is bad strategically and it's bad strategically because there's an iconic
game where names which played Bishop Differe against Capablanca and it just solves Black's problems.
It's like they've got an upgraded version of the French defense without a bad bishop.
And then quite often, you know, EF five is weak.
Seaforth week later.
And so there are great games with there's this really doesn't offer way too much, in my view, to do
this.
So in more recent years, in the advance version, it has been revitalized with a shorter bishop move
by Nigel Short Bishop Itou.
That's well worth checking out Nigel Shaw's treatment.
Where, Bishop Eita, if you are tempted to play the advanced version with A5 again, it's all about
the follow ups, the strength of the follow ups.
Your strength for the follow ups is is based on your research of the Standard Model games.
So find the key exponents.
So those are the major players who who make use of their top level grandmasters, ideally.
So, you know, Nigel Short to look out for the advanced variation.
So here are if we look again now at the five, though, we don't have to see late 1993, 92, or if
we can play it 65, the exchange variation and the main line is Bishop Differe.
And that has certain ideas.
Sometimes it's trying to keep this bishop locked in and have a small edge.
Sometimes there's also the pan of poverty panic attack.
So make our bottleneck for the bottleneck part of that panel for the panel pass.
And there's actually a famous Bobby Fischer game that was buried in The Sims with a panel of Bortman,
that game of Bobby Fischer against Max.
Oh, quite fascinating by The Sims.
Use a cultural game like that.
There's the there's also on the free here.
There's the so-called Toccoa or Fancy variation.
So Tasco is a great source of very witty chaske rotations and is worth checking out just for as kind
of advice buried in his quotations.
Very, very witty.
Like, you know, chess is like a fairy tale of a thousand man blunders.
The winner is the player that makes the loss but one mistake.
So, yeah, check out Tasco as well, his quotations.
But this is named after him.
That's very nice tribute to him, to remember him and his contributions, that chance.
So his legacy there in that name.
So, yeah, chess has this rich cultural heritage.
And, you know, it's not all about the mercenary functionality.
And the more you get engaged with the chess culture or chess, there's that rich set of pointers.
If you want to research how to play certain types of positions and you knew which world champions were
strong and weak, if you know the pros and cons of each world champion, you know, stylistically,
relatively speaking, because they're masters on all aspects of chess, the world champions, but somewhat
stronger in some some areas than other world champions in a way.
But yeah, this rich cultural heritage is worth knowing, even from a mercenary point of view.
If you know the names, do you know what to look up?
You can find your own games.
So culture and history is kind of important thing in my view, even for newcomers to the game.
Certain international most coaches have alluded to this, that when they're training junior players,
the more that the junior players knew about the famous players, the more they tended to do better.
Later on, they have the pointers to go look up.
Games concretely as one example is much more engaging to know about a bit about the history and culture
of chess.
And it's the opening names and the name Variations which do provide that to us.
So here anyway, after default, the 593.
So we'll put the five nicely frame.
We have the two nights version.
Pomi, sorry, 846.
Now, this is a bit peculiar when you don't actually play DeFore and Fisher actually played Nazi free.
So I found this a bit of a surprising choice in Bobby Fischer's repertoire, which I've deeply studied.
Bobby Fischer escapes to my physical courses, but he played two nights.
He freight's I moved to 93, then he played here.
I am afraid this is the two nights vacation he had, you know, his ups and downs with this version.
It's not like a totally amazing variation as a general point scorer.
It gets an interesting mental game.
So, yeah, the two nights variation is worth checking out games of, in particular.
Bobby Fischer, if you want to have some example games of what happens here after this.
Generally, Bobby Fischer has opponents, I can tell you now don't generally played for.
I think you'll be able to like tango the night over here.
And we're in my kind of tango territory.
We have a nice bishop outside the pawn chain.
Generally, they don't do that.
They're not they realize that there's a trade off going on between this invitation to invitation's in
space with the four and, you know, doing other things like, you know, because it weakens it weakens
the line squares to do this in general.
So they tend to do other things.
You don't actually see too many examples of four in the two nights variation.
You usually you know, you see things like Bishop G for getting that bishop out before he gets locked
into the pawn chain.
This would be super passive.
You know that that would be great.
You know, if we don't get this ideal -- center and then, you know, you get a possession, which
is kind of like an improved version against the French defenses, like the bishops.
I mean, it's like a French defense structure here.
And if blacks, you know, deLites, if you got other options here and, you know, quite often if they
play like this, you can quite often, in my experience, get a stranglehold over 85.
Even if you don't have the classic pawn chain, it doesn't really matter.
You've got a big grip on E5 and that could be used as a basis for an attack later.
So, yeah, the two nights federation is pretty interesting.
It was a favorite of Bobby Fischer basically.
So you start of the CCE, you just play nice free.
So yeah, this is a great way of sidestepping a lot of Carnochan opening Ferrey.
There's opening Ferrey everywhere you go to work out an experiment sometimes.
What really excites you?
So what floats your boat, what excites you, what interests you.
But to give something a good sense.
Yeah.
Try and get those model games before you actually play.
If it's the more serious you become as a chess player, the more kind of preparation maybe in your opening
departments.
It's like the performance opening's department middleground and games and then other skills.
Psychology is a big, big skill and psychology as it relates to win probability.
So if you know your opponent hates light and games, then maybe you're you're going to be fun playing
games and beat them in the end game.
So psychology has, as it relates to win problems in particular for me is is is a more specific use
of psychology, which I've witnessed with many, many games of Bobby Fisher.
You're choosing particular openings against particular opponents because he thought maybe they were
more theoretically would have had to play more obscure thing against them.
Maybe they like tactics more.
And he may play in different ways.
Like Mikoto in Blitz, Fisher would use an opening system, which is more Implats, you know, less
Taxco and Queens coming off early and he beats with that.
So basically, psychology is also another major skill set.
There are multiple skill sets that link into each other and make the final success as a chess player.
But it's not just what you might think.
Okinu game and game.
There's loads of other skills and psychology, this big one, the psychology as it relates to choosing
which variations based on your opponent's strengths and weaknesses and that implication for win probability.
It's something to really start seriously considering as you get more and more serious.
I mean, Paul Georges of Alluded was torturing me with these positional choices because I knew I like
tactics.
So he wants to keep the game more kind of about the pawns and not about the tactics, you know, more
close positional maneuvering.
OK, so anyway, Corica on defense.
Yeah.
So there are these main variations if you want to kind of try and remember the names a little bit,
OK?
And so much.