Hi there in this thing.
I just wanted to emphasize this in effect clause, there's looking at the whole position for liberation,
opening up things vs. them being potentially closed up as they hope things can sometimes dictate how
liberated pieces are.
The pawns are the soul of chess, Philidor apparently said, All-staff adds that the very livelihood
of the game, maybe there's another interpretation.
When we play openings, all levels of liberation of the pieces are kind of set quite dramatically.
Even then, the same names opening.
So one example I'd like to give you is if you play E4 and they play the Sicilian offense, the main
variation of the Sicilian defense is the Open Sicilian, and in it you play Not Afraid of the desex,
you actually play defore.
And this might seem as though, hold on, you're not developing your pieces.
This is breaking and really not throwing pieces.
So why would you do this?
Well, let's look at it in terms of liberation.
It actually liberates the queen opens up this bishop.
It has the duration of fangs and it is one of the more popular variations on the Sicilian defense.
So often she takes nine takes.
Both sides have agreed this still that they've liberated certain pieces on both sides and it makes the
games more tactical and dynamic in nature.
--'s as things as you know, the fundamental constraint on pieces, but also any pieces you analyze
or pawns in your process of calculation will liberate the possession and make the game in a way you
could say or hopefully more tactical for you that your pieces are more alive.
They have new opportunities.
So it's almost like a tactical boost you've given yourself.
If you contrast this to the closed Sicilian, the so-called closed Sicilian, it's 93.
You know, for example, the position is more closed and we can see the pieces are not so liberated.
The pawns are the fundamental constraint of the pieces.
Austine says there's so many pawns.
And here, if we look at the queen, it's not so liberated.
It hasn't got a view on the defoliate.
And later, when the queen moves and comes, that rook is not so open and neither has black got so many
opportunities on the sea.
Foliar, this is more closed in nature.
So when we look at the in effect, Claus's.
We're really seeing the liberation war phase, and that might actually sometimes encourages at the key
moments when our pieces are in the right place.
It's kind of liberate pieces often of a central pawn break.
Often pawns will open up key pieces.
So fundamentally, yeah, it's a very, very powerful tool in its own right, as well as the awareness
of the new scope of pieces.
That awareness might encourage you to look out for ways of opening up a position and then the opening.
You know, it's it's your choice.
But as you begin chess, old recommends making the positions more open in nature and quite often old
things which remove pawns from the board by default.
They have more liberated pieces and more pieces means you have more opportunities to calculate very
specific, more technical, more tactical lines and variations.
So, yeah, if you're playing against the SAS in the sense this is a popular variation, the Open Sicilian,
but I just want to put this in the perspective of liberation.
Liberating pieces, those one season I played quite close to opening.
And I kind of regret that the fence, the fence and the next season, I chose to sit in the fence and
I had some positions which suited my more tactical stance is much better.
Just bear that in mind.
That's my first golden claws, you know.
So we look at when we calculate, we look at weakness.
We lost both catacombs and liberation all thanks.
That's profoundly sat in the opening that you choose from the start of the game, how open or closed
the position is, and it's quite often the pawns which dictate how open or closed the position is.
So just bear that in mind as well.
OK?
That's much.