In this case, I just want to spell out something about chess.
It's a single term game.
I can tell you facts about chess, like it's a single singleton game and there's implications which
you can actually derive from that, that means if you can play a move which seems to overwhelm the opponents
with more than one frat's, even if they're aware of those facts, they might not be able to handle
them.
They've only got a single turn.
Quite often the basis for successful tactics in chess are based on the notion of the double attack.
The double attack or fork is one of the most important tactical weapons.
Talk to any beginners on.
If you look at tons and tons of beginner courses, they'll all list the basic tactics and the double
attack.
Wilfork is usually listed.
It's a really, really fundamental tactic.
I mean, there are other tactical devices, but the double attack is actually at the heart of many successful
chess combinations.
And it goes back to the fact that chess is a single term game.
That means if you can overwhelm the opponents with a single move by you and you create multiple threats,
unless they can do a single defensive move that can simultaneously defend those multiple threats, they're
often in big trouble.
Now, sometimes you don't give a fork is when you use a single piece to double attack, but you can
get like the in effect clause of my three golden rules.
So sometimes you move the pace, but it's not that piece directly which is even doing the multiple attacks.
It could be the liberationist effects of your move.
So wings of last move, Telecom's squares and the liberation or face.
And that could be a side effect, that which creates overwhelming threat scenario.
Chess is a single term game and you've just overwhelmed your opponents with a single move.
Can you say in this position a move which could do that to the opponents and cause an immediate resignation?
So glad to play here.
You might want to pause the video and look in particular at the liberationist effects of those three
golden rules, the in effect clause.
So not just the move you've moved in the mind's eye, but look at the entire possession.
That is a kind of essential thing of calculation.
Don't be distracted by basically what you've just lost, moved.
It can be a distraction in its own right to look at the wider implications of what you've just done,
the in effect.
So it comes from, you know, work placements I had once.
I see how someone would say in effect all the time.
It got me thinking, you know, things do have an effect, you know, unintended consequences sometimes
in real life.
Yeah.
So it's not just what happened, but it's the unintended consequences.
So but on the chessboard, yeah.
You need to look out for this because sometimes these moves can be so useful to overwhelm the opponent
in space.
Yeah.
Single turn game.
So here is their move, which overwhelms the opponent because it creates more than one front.
So if you prioritize your forcing most.
So especially chacal checks.
Checkable captures checkable frat's, especially significant frat's, major frat's are making one or
two war ending France.
OK.
Hopefully you find that not after his ineffectual whinges displays Rook takes after you and you've given
them an upside instead of a liberation of your bishop, you've just closed in your bishop.
Yeah, this is a tragic fall into given this the students this doesn't just give them a little upside.
You want to look for these.
You know, you don't want to give them any micro upsides when you play forcing moves.
That's a warning to you.
There's another way of doing this.
Maybe you want to unveil this night, but we can do so with tempo with 95.
So it's with tempo because it's attacking the queen and we're still threatening Queen takes age as well.
So what we've just done is overwhelm the opponents.
We've tried to frat's for the price of one move.
And this is how you win games in a more abstract sense, maybe not even chance of other single turn
games.
If you can do quite a lot with one move and they've only got a single turn to reply, they could be
overwhelmed and that's it.
So, yeah, the base is a lot of chess tactics and combinations is a double attack.
The double attack doesn't even have to be from a single pace and in particular it could be from the
discovery effects of the position.
So here is the discovery effects of H3, which makes this so decisive was why didn't he do well?
It has to resign as example.
If offtakes, then Queen takes H3 in his chemie.
If they handle that, then which just going to take their queen.
If they move that queen then which is going to come in and the bishops remains unobstructed.
You've maintained the existing liberation of the bishop.
You haven't reduced it with my AFTA and we just come in with the Queen.
So, OK, I just want the more abstract point from this particular lecture.
Just remember, the basis of most successful CHASKE combinations are the double attack and most beginners
course is the focal double-take is discussed.
There are other tactical weapons.
I mean, the discovered attack or discoveries is also sometimes discussed.
And that also leads to this notion of a double attack or more than one more than two attacks which are
overwhelming.
The essential principle is overwhelming.
Freda's, for a single move in a single tank game can be a decisive factor to help you win those games,
especially chess.
That is our main focus of this course.
So the spirit, the undertone, the underpinnings that you're looking for is to overwhelm the opponent.
You don't want to have these games where you friend hoping that they they parry a new friend, they
parry and you just carry on an endless game.
You want to play decisively.
You want to play moves that have irreversible damage.
You want to say, look, I know this is a strong move, but is there a stronger one which might even
threatened this and that or this, this that overwhelm them?
The spirit of overwhelming the opponent with multiple friends is something which is the kind of undertone
of successful chess tactics and combinations.
OK, that's a much.