Hi there in this line, shall we say that the arm Checkmate is kind of separate the calculation.
Sometimes you have the opponents, Kingscote Squares all cut out, but here they're all Cartwell.
The king has no escape squares.
The king cannot move anywhere.
But you know what?
We need to introduce that krsek to actually make this mean, you know, checkmate.
Where does this Krsek come from?
On this occasion.
This is a bit of a quandary.
It's like a catch 22.
Because, you know, if we move the rook, then this is not threatening checkmate, we're not threatening
checkmate anymore.
We've got G-7.
It's not even a threat.
The rook is controlling escape squares and they all seem to be tied up, you know, controlling escape
squares.
Is there any free resource here that we can add to the equation which might be useful for delivering
an actual checkmate while the other pieces here are struggling to keep the king contained?
What's the checkmating?
Piece or.
Paul.
That's a bit of a clue for you.
Sometimes you can actually check my make.
Now, these pawns, they seem unlikely candidates which are made the opponents came totally true.
This point seems unlikely.
Can they?
What about this guy?
You know, in theory, there's a theoretical downside.
This is super theoretical.
But if this poll came up, the border would actually be the only pawn to deliver a check.
Look at these others.
They don't deliver a check that doesn't deliver a check that the check is the only pawn which will actually
deliver a check here.
This one can't deliver a check.
We're talking sometimes we have to step back totally fair at school.
That's almost a fact of the case to celebrate is that we want to celebrate all facts of the case.
We might not be using loud sounding, forcing me to celebrate our facts of the case.
We might sometimes be using quiet moves, especially when we already have a kind of meeting that sets
up taking the arrows off, which is a fantastic move in this position, which can actually help deliver.
Cellmate.
Yeah, the are checkmates sometimes dictates you need to introduce a new piece or -- to chat where.
And here we can do that with A4.
This is a wonderful move.
If we look at our processes of calculation now, you know, black actually has to resign.
If he thinks that's a weakness of the last move, it's weakened can full control, which means we've
got a new opportunity right before it's checkmate.
Ouch.
And the thing is, OK, so they challenge one of our pieces, what do we have here?
Check the little bits, the forcing those all checks.
Every check will check there and there's quite a few checks to consider like these six, but doesn't
do anything, surely rookie something that doesn't do anything, surely.
But what about the other checks, even the outrageous ones?
What about our theoretical fact that we established about this --?
Hopefully we can arrive at 94 check to celebrate some more theoretical fact that we observed that now
on 884, yeah, we can deliver the final checkmate with that five.
The key point of this example is, yeah, taking out escape squads in the arch at night, but sometimes
you do need to introduce a lot of people to do the final check and sometimes you need to check out theoretically
to establish almost that theoretical fact, a fictional fact and fiction that certain people could,
in theory, check the opponent's king.
That could be the difference between you losing and winning a game of chess.
So try and ascertain these theoretical facts of these theoretical checks.
They could be the ingredient you need to add to your meeting that to make it about me, because those
existing pieces that they're too concerned with controlling the skyscrapers, you need another check
from somewhere and sometimes it can be a little pawn.
OK, so I thought this is a bit of a beautiful example.
I hope you like it.
And I hope that idea of the art of checkmate is a separate art in its own right.
The art of taking out game squares and introducing sometimes checks from unexpected sources, even --'s.
OK, that's much.