Hi there in this show, this is a relatively simple example of kella common squares, just the notion
of common squares where your pieces cooperate, they can be absolutely lethal without doing anything
even spectacular or, you know, you don't have to do an amazing looking move sometimes.
And it's just the act of your pieces.
Cooperating can cause the opponent to have to resign.
Can you see a move here which creates basically this spirit of cooperation between your pieces to create
kind of common squares so those access to squares can be absolutely lethal and very, very difficult
to defend against.
That looks as though also here we don't want to be kind of tuned in always to the habit of recapturing.
So they might have taken on B5 in their last move.
Let's imagine they've just taken something on B5, but their king is kind of out on the ball, especially
so when they're all kind of quite visible, intuitive downsides of the opponent's possession, the notion
of automatically recapturing is something you learn that as a complete newcomer to the chess at the
start, of course, you must also recapture, except there are situations in chess because the object
the game is to make the opponents can wear sometimes also recapturing that might be bigger fish to fry.
So in this position, do you capture on B5 or is there any way of igniting within that process of calculation,
especially the notion of common squares?
So what would you play here?
Would you take on B5 or was there something else?
OK.
You can ignore that, Bishop, on this occasion, you can actually bring your queen out here and all
of a sudden the queen is looking to cooperate with the bishop on before there's a of common square.
The queen is also looking to cooperate with the knights on for the queen, a real body of these pieces
threatening to chat me on B4 or C Sifry.
And actually, you know why it has to resign her mates inevitable.
If, for example, a free, then we can still play Queen Sifry and we've got another common square here,
which is B two.
So that's checkmate.
So yes, the common squares, even plain vanilla moves with killer common squares could just spell out
a total disaster for the opponent.
What makes it less than plain vanilla sometimes is that it's not based on an automatic reCAPTCHA reaction.
The expectation quite often for opponents when they catch something.
Is Fuds also reCAPTCHA?
You want to keep your resolution of possibilities like, you know, one of those expensive TVs, high
resolution to do that, even also recaptures.
The longer the time control, the more you need to think about your options.
Sometimes those options, which are usually bad, sometimes that they're actually very, very good,
that instead of auto recapturing, you shouldn't always be on autopilot in the longer time controls,
especially try and reduce autopilot, you know, then you can see.
Sometimes major options which are going to win you a game quite quickly.
And so here this major option, Queeny five, if bishop takes a fall, then queen before is checkmate
there.
So, yeah, this is absolutely devastating move.
If Seefried, then we could take here.
And after King-Size, well, we got Queen before Chemie, so.
Yeah, Queen a five devastating.
Just kind of relatively simple example that sometimes just the queen cooperating with other squares
for those telecom squares is enough for the opponents to just resign.
OK, and so much.