Hi there.
In this lecture, there is an amazing tactical idea, which is of the theme, removing the guard, the
FEMSA and undermining Israel and undermining style move.
And bear in mind, when you undermine actually you don't always need to just win material.
You can actually win access to a square.
It's very, very handy sometimes in winning.
So, you know, if you have a winning combination, you don't really be too fussy if it kind of reminds
you of undermining, but it's undermining a square and sort of actually a piece of a poem.
And you still win.
It doesn't actually matter.
You still win.
Right.
So here can you see a key undermining stall tactic?
If I give you five seconds for the video?
OK, yeah, we can remove this defender of if it's actually OK, it's not defending a piece of a --,
but it's defending a case where they have to pawn.
So it's worth making a note of that.
We're removing that defender.
So White played Rook takes AFTA and now with that newly won square, we can actually make use of it.
93 Chac, unfortunately.
And the bishops are not covering it.
Nothing's covering it.
And we've got a Royal Forker.
We're talking king and queen.
So I'm talking to you on 1962 and up to 94 queening six White resigned.
So that was in Bronagh against Joseph Rickter in 1941, by the way.
So, yes.
So sometimes we can undermine just again a key square as this example shows.
I wouldn't be too fussy.
It's the same kind of principle you're removing a key defender, which is part of a chain.
That chain could be a logical chain.
It could be, you know, it's statements could be a pawn, a pawn or pawn or piece of a pawn in the
square.
It's you're just undermining logically a part of board here if it is logically undermined by taking
out the effort to pawn.
Okay.
So I hope that's a useful thing to think about.
And you've got that answer much.