Hi there.
And it's things I'd like to introduce you to, the idea of a deflection tactic now is a little bit similar,
in my view, to removing the defender.
When we use the word re moving notice there's the pole moving and in fact.
Will it be the same effect sometimes, either if we remove or just move the defender?
What we've done is gain access sometimes to a key square, or we can win material, you know, a pawn
or a piece.
So, you know, we're looking to gain a square, a pawn or a piece.
Quite often we don't actually have to literally remove the defender that that requirement is only for
the broader goal of gaining access to these amazing, you know, squares or pieces of pawns.
So here, can we actually move a key defender and end up winning material?
So I'm a look at this position and prioritize your forcing moves.
And there is something quite magical here to be found.
So if I give you five cents for the video, what would you play in this position?
OK, we can actually.
Remove the defender of the queen, the queen is only defended by the king, so we want to kind of deflect
or move the defender.
Deflection is the kind of official term that most chess tacticians use, and it's distinct from decoy
in a decoy.
You actually are really concerned where you kind of move the defender, too.
But here we just want to move the defender of the queen, which is the king, away from taxing the queen.
And we can do that with 96 seven.
So we're forking the queen a rook.
So let's assume Black doesn't want to lose material like that.
They take.
So the king has moved from DHS.
In a way, we've kind of undermines the state.
But how do we use that now, this position where that queen is unprotected on the right now?
Can you spot a move here if you prioritize forcing moves Czechoslovaks, is there a move which can help
you win that queen, which is an unprotected piece?
I'll take two pieces tend to fall off as the expression goes.
So here I hope you can spot it.
Wikinews Bishop Desex Chac, which is a discovery, has a discovery effect.
Look at the effect on the whole board.
We're actually hitting the queen as well as being Chac.
And if Plack tries to rescue the Queen.
Say, with King, he then actually that makes things kind of really, really bad.
It's Bishop G5 and that is actually checkmate.
So pretty brutal.
Knight takes F7 is kind of moving the defender.
We're not removing the defender, we're moving the defender.
So in a way, we can look out for similar kind of concepts like undermining to try and get access to
a key square, a pawn or piece.
We're kind of gaining access in a way to deflate.
By by not removing the kind of moving and deflecting that defendant away from certain key square pawn
or piece.
So, yes, this is quite a crushing blow.
And if black, you know, just takes we're going to take that queen.
And sometimes it's important to know if there's a backfire or not because we have a pawn on Sifry.
There's no bishop before check.
Imagine if there wasn't a policy free, it would be a little bit of a different story that I could maybe
get the queen back, at least if the queen has to come back.
But there's no bishop before Chac.
So we've actually kind of won the queen under very favorable circumstances indeed.
So, yes, it takes seven as a type of tactic called a deflection tactic.
And you can kind of think of it conceptually.
I think this might be helpful.
It's kind of helpful to me to think of it as not removing the family, but moving the offender.
OK, as so much.