Hi there.
In this example, it looks pretty dangerous for us here.
We can't make the apartment because the bishop is defending.
So we seem to be under attack majorly in this position.
If we take the bishop, we're going to get checkmated.
So is this a desperate situation or can the interference tactic save the day here or even win it for
us?
In fact, there was a move which Tony Mon's, one of Britain's leading grandmothers at the time, played
against Bridgeheads and actually won the game, which had actually resigned after this next move.
I wonder if you couldn't find it.
I'll give you five seconds, pause the video.
It's a rather beautiful interference stall tactic.
OK, so we really want to break down the communications of blacks position, there are communications
between this point and this point, between this point in this point.
And in fact, if we look at the intersection, we can do something rather cruel with one move based
on that intersection.
We can throw a spanner in the works.
And you might ask the more discerning Spanish press might ask, where exactly do you throw the spanner
in the works?
Well, here and in many other examples, you look at the intersection point and actually further split
of that.
So which spanner?
It's the bishop.
Wow, and this connects essentially interferes with this point and this point at this point in this
point.
Of course it does.
And the game actually ended here.
If Rook eight takes a five, then that this connection as appearance Queen 67 is Chameides.
And same with this one disconnects that key diagram.
So what does Black actually do if Bishop takes B to check the wonderful thing here as bishop things
B to renews that Friends of Queen 67 Chatenay Black has those key checks and it's important not to give
the opponent checks.
By the way, if you plan, you've got this, you ask him for Queen seats and getting chameides it.
So there's no immediate major checks for black in Queen now, which doesn't do anything on this occasion
and say the retreat's then blacks really in big trouble, for example, like this is a false checkmate
sequence like this.
So that's a forced checkmate there.
So this really does for España in Black Swans, it's a wonderful example of indifference.
If Bishop takes F5, then OK, G7 is defended, but this connection is broken.
So Queen eats Chank Queen G six Jack.
I'm the is actually mating so yeah.
Bishop e5 a wonderful example.
Finding that intersection point for maximum disruption of communication between the pieces actually
spells a major disaster for black indisposition.
So, yeah, very, very interesting and friends move, you might also ask Coton King's question isn't
a really resourceful defensa informal queen 67.
Yes.
OK, we've got to be careful here if we take them, we're we in the background, we don't want to be
cremated.
Yes, good point.
But we've still got some of the artifacts of the interference here.
So, in fact, in this position, if we take with the queen, then we're not being back cremated.
And this point is still not in touch with this point.
So basically, if, you know, Bishop takes to attract the bishop out of danger, then quintets Yangcheng
And we're back to the meeting after, so that's no good.
And if the opponent does this, then actually, you know, we just take the bishop on this occasion
and we're just winning here.
So, yeah, all in all, it's absolutely crushing.
Whatever black dance, however black slices.
And this this is a really crushing interference.
Over and over.
OK, I will do that.
It got something out of it too much.