Hi there, and shall we say an amazing example of playing against the bank with.
This is Russell Simmons of one of the former world champions of chess played in 1945 in the USSR championship.
This is against rudovsky.
So let's see this game, four man's love.
We see a Sicilian defense might have ESX Difford see tax night takes the form of six Nazi free desex.
So for the moment, Blank has a shape in England.
Putin's Russia.
This is a Sicilian Chauvelin generation where you get this pawn structure.
We see Bishop Itou Bishop.
He's on both sides.
Castle Bishop every free Nazi sex and not efore.
We see Queen seven and now Queen is one.
So the FAA does facilitate the Queen seemingly with aggressive intent on the style of sometimes 1964
is played Bishop 64 and now Black plays E5.
This leaves a backward pawn.
The pawn has been left behind.
It can only be supported by pieces.
This is the thing about structural weaknesses.
When they have a dependency on pieces, that means the opponent's position can become overworks as pieces
get exchanged off.
This could also become weaker in its own right as its defenders are taken off the board.
So it can be a potential major liability.
This desex pawn.
We see Bishop Avery Bishop ESX.
EF five and now Black plays Bishop CIFOR and the way this stands by a massive positional favor, if
we can get a nice outpost on DFI, that would be ideal here.
And to achieve that, getting rid of the lions by bishops is something logical.
So the outpost is not addressable with a bishop.
ESX Bishop takes the five days for a bishop.
See sex bishop takes the five.
They're just getting rid of the square.
Bishops means a potential outpost on the five will be unassailable.
And hear why it plays a move focused on this square in front of the backward pawn to create a nice outpost.
Guess what?
That move.
As if I give you five seconds to pause video.
This is classic stuff, Bishop G five White doesn't mind giving up the dance choir bishop to amplify
the outpost, Brooke, having AIDS and without prompting just takes on F sex.
OK, Black has that bishop without a counterpart.
But in this structure, with the backward -- and with this huge outpost, this bishop seems, you
know, not very effective.
We see Bishop, the AIDS in black is greedy with queen taketo whites best.
This first to carefully play a move like rock have to to avoid losing Beita.
And then after C one, when an exchange like this and this position where White can build on Cifas concretely
is an advantage when it has to be careful not to lose too many pawns for the exchange.
But this would be an advantage for white, this position.
So anyway, the point is not taken on Setsu.
We see Bishop the eight and they'll see free protects that pawn being five.
So there's a kind of minority attack when a minority of pawns tries to cause structural damage to majority
of pawns.
That's a minority attack.
Is it effective here?
Will be Frase played Quincy five.
Check each one rook C8.
The knight puts any such attack on hold it controls before we see McCaffrey and in fact why it has aggressive
intent.
It seems there are moves.
They have sex.
There are moves that were cage free queen Jeoffrey maybe later or the queen coming up to support on
each one just by forcing the bishop, basically.
So we see how King age eight as an example of Black's difficulties, if things this doesn't good in
principle to shut down the bishop like that, just to stop things.
But for example, age frame, you know why the white queen comes of age for now as well.
And this kind of thing is just really unpleasant.
For example, like this with Brooke takes G7 becoming possible because there's a meltdown of King's
safety here after age four to secure the back row act.
You know, put oneself beyond the feet before going on the attack with our friend Jeffrey.
If Rook J.
And then there's Queen at six and that's chameides.
And this situation is unpalatable.
Queen St. Paul is reopening the queen.
It's hopeless for black with Rook Jeoffrey coming.
And you know, there's a yeah, it's just it's just a hopeless position.
You know, for example, Carl puts me on the board.
RUGGIE Free.
How do we defend the mate?
As desperate as that.
And for example, here in Queens, I find it's another example.
So anyway, all in all, King H.H. was chosen not for sex, but now it does, of course, that I wanted
to play safe sex.
And this is a very disruptive move to blacks defensive resources giving black double pulls.
That as well as the back report.
Now, does this have concrete implications for King's safety?
We see Queen H for.
Ruchi, eight, nine, six, so frightening, Queensland's 87 might that's protected 87 square, but
Uruk Jeoffrey and actually, if you look at the tactical franscell, what is quite frightening, say
eight five was played.
Can you see what one is threatening?
There's a cute idea here behind the scenes.
If you check who checks prioritize the most, I hope you can spot that there's a queen size H7 in this
position will rotate actually.
So Black actually gave up the bishop to count that night to the rookies.
Penn's rook goes to the gate and then we see a property of the back of pawn.
It's only the queen supporting that backward pawn.
So as pieces have been exchanged off this banquet with which has no support from fellow pawns, is feeling
the pressure.
And blacks already locked up here with this nasty pen, blacks really tied up in knots, black ties
D5 it's a hopeless position.
If Quincy seven, then, you know, Rook takes desex and here white displays plays.
Take G7 that I wrote the check and the queen will have to give himself up the road.
Can't go back.
So we see D5 and now Rokitansky seven, it's a similar story, it's devastation of the Route 25 hitting
the queen and also there's a killer common scar on the eight to be used.
So Black resigned her.
Yeah.
If you know, Quincy, someone wrote the check is very strong, black will have to give up the queen.
It's just a hopeless position.
Maybe one can even go back and say, at this point, it's hopeless.
So, yes, we see in this game a kind of celebration of the Outpost Square in particular of the backward
poem that was created in the middle game, the Outpost Square, amplified by weight, not minding sacking
Setu.
There's tactics which support this one can actually just win an exchange.
And the relations with Queens seem to.
But otherwise, the outpost left on the board as the dominant knight entrenched in front of the back
would pull the back.
Whipworm provides shelter.
It means that the outpost is more unassailable if we look at the quality of outposts and how unassailable
they are.
Some outposts because of the absence of the of membership's that cannot be taken off very easily.
Accept foreign exchange sack maybe.
But this takes a lot of time.
And for what?
Just to be the exchange down so that my outpost is like an octopus here, spreading its tentacles in
all directions and looking off the way, you know, minority attacks.
No problem.
You know, like controls before attacks on the king.
No problem.
You know, it sort things out this night.
It sort things out and remove the arrow
and provides the fence, avoids attack.
It's in front of the back of a pawn.
It's an ideal thing to aim for, you know, nice night outposts quite often in front of structural weaknesses,
especially central bank with poor means, essential night.
If it was a backward ball here and it's not as significant, it's an octopus in the center and it's
in front of a central bank with --.
So I hope there's some key features of this game to take away some takeaway points that actually quite
often.
The acts of exploiting the opponents back with Paul is not the act of eliminating, it sometimes seems,
which is stop phrase restrained blockade, destroy is not quite the reality of the situation.
You might want to restrain the blockade.
But no interest in destroying you've got a nice outpost really depends on the situation followups nice
outpost's gives you great leverage to amplify your attacking potential to make it much more difficult
for the opponent.
It was only later that actually when that night's exchange off, then we have a frontal attack against
the backward form.
I hope you get the important points here that once the outpost was exchanged off, then the frontal
attack against these things is extremely evident and it's extremely evident there's a total lack of
available support.
Just from a theoretical perspective, there's nothing black could have done here to avoid white crashing
through that defo.
The whole default is kind of vulnerable now because that bank report is not an effective barrier, so
a crushing positional gain.
One of Smith's law's most destructive games, perhaps.
OK, not so much.